Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/17/14 13:59, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Hi,
I got an ICE while building libstdc++ of a cross compiler x86 to aarch64. I
have a testcase that ICEs on current GCC trunk. I was trying to painfully
reduce it with creduce, and it is still several thousand lines of c++.
Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/17/14 13:59, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Hi,
I got an ICE while building libstdc++ of a cross compiler x86 to aarch64.
I
have a testcase that ICEs on current GCC trunk. I was trying to painfully
reduce it with creduce, and it is still several thousand lines of
On 09/19/14 08:11, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Jeff Law wrote:
On 09/17/14 13:59, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Hi,
I got an ICE while building libstdc++ of a cross compiler x86 to aarch64. I
have a testcase that ICEs on current GCC trunk. I was trying to painfully
reduce it with creduce, and it is still
Jan Hubicka wrote:
I am bit in hurry, so just quickly (will give it second look at evening). The
pass is a simple dataflow propagating preferred sections. NULL means that the
symbol in question was not visited yet. Assuming that all symbols are
reachable,
this should not happen by the end
On 09/17/14 13:59, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Hi,
I got an ICE while building libstdc++ of a cross compiler x86 to aarch64. I
have a testcase that ICEs on current GCC trunk. I was trying to painfully
reduce it with creduce, and it is still several thousand lines of c++.
Frustrated
that it does not
Hi,
I got an ICE while building libstdc++ of a cross compiler x86 to aarch64. I
have a testcase that ICEs on current GCC trunk. I was trying to painfully
reduce it with creduce, and it is still several thousand lines of c++.
Frustrated
that it does not reduce anymore, I decided to have a look
