On 11 July 2015 at 06:46, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/10/2015 06:34 PM, John Marino wrote:
After posting the first testsuite results for DragonFly, it was clear
that the -fcilkplus functionality was broken:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg01046.html
The problem was related to
On 7/11/2015 1:45 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11 July 2015 at 06:46, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/10/2015 06:34 PM, John Marino wrote:
After posting the first testsuite results for DragonFly, it was clear
that the -fcilkplus functionality was broken:
After posting the first testsuite results for DragonFly, it was clear
that the -fcilkplus functionality was broken:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg01046.html
The problem was related to the __cpu_model symbol not getting exported.
The solution was to create
On 07/10/2015 06:34 PM, John Marino wrote:
After posting the first testsuite results for DragonFly, it was clear
that the -fcilkplus functionality was broken:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg01046.html
The problem was related to the __cpu_model symbol not getting exported.
