On Dec 2, 2013, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> All the documentation relevant to this architecture uses the term
>> "aarch64". How is arm64 obvious?
>
> The same reason Linus used arm64:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/15/133
Thanks for the link, ah, now I exactly understand what that port i
On 29 Nov 2013, at 19:38, "Andrew Pinski" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Please let's pick aarch64. Everybody names it this way, except of course
>> Debian
>
> And the linux kernel.
>
The Linux kernel reports aarch64 in its uname. It's only the source
On 2 Dec 2013, at 00:06, "Rob Pike" wrote:
> arm64 it is
>
This is perverse and completely inconsistent with the rest of the gnu tool
chain. It makes no sense at all to me for go to be inconsistent in this way.
R.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Marcus Shawcroft
wrote:
> On 1 December 2013 19:55, Michael Hudson-Doyle
> wrote:
>> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>>
>>> I've gotten a patch from Michael Hudson-Doyle to set GOARCH to arm64
>>> on an Aarch64 system (https://codereview.appspot.com/34830045/).
>>
>> Hah
On 1 December 2013 19:55, Michael Hudson-Doyle
wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
>
>> I've gotten a patch from Michael Hudson-Doyle to set GOARCH to arm64
>> on an Aarch64 system (https://codereview.appspot.com/34830045/).
>
> Haha, go us.
>
>> I've gotten a patch from Matthias Klose to set GOARC
arm64 it is
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> I've gotten a patch from Michael Hudson-Doyle to set GOARCH to arm64
> on an Aarch64 system (https://codereview.appspot.com/34830045/).
Haha, go us.
> I've gotten a patch from Matthias Klose to set GOARCH to aarch64 on
> such a system
> (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pa
aarch64 is arguably correct but not very evocative (to speak
politely). the arm marketing people must be uninterested in
distinguishing their design from other systems.
arm64 is clearer and in line with amd64, but possibly confusing therefore.
aarch64 is perhaps the better choice but arm64 would
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please let's pick aarch64. Everybody names it this way, except of course
> Debian
And the linux kernel.
> :-/ If I understand ARM developers correctly, there will be something like
> aarch32 in the future (x32 for ARM), and I think you
Please let's pick aarch64. Everybody names it this way, except of course Debian
:-/ If I understand ARM developers correctly, there will be something like
aarch32 in the future (x32 for ARM), and I think you don't want to call it
arm32.
Matthias
Am 29.11.2013 20:22, schrieb Ian Lance Taylor:
I've gotten a patch from Michael Hudson-Doyle to set GOARCH to arm64
on an Aarch64 system (https://codereview.appspot.com/34830045/). I've
gotten a patch from Matthias Klose to set GOARCH to aarch64 on such a
system (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03765.html).
I don't care one way o
This patch introduces aarch64 as a Go architecture.
Matthias
# DP: Introduce aarch64 goarch.
--- a/src/libgo/go/go/build/syslist.go
+++ a/src/libgo/go/go/build/syslist.go
@@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
package build
const goosList = "darwin dragonfly freebsd linux netbsd openbsd plan9 windows
solaris "
-
12 matches
Mail list logo
