[patch] std::polar requires non-negative rho

2015-05-13 Thread Jonathan Wakely
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459 Voted into the WP in Lenexa. Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk. commit 9bf3b9ea20334711ecdced656323f69959521a82 Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com Date: Wed May 13 14:18:03 2015 +0100 *

Re: [patch] std::polar requires non-negative rho

2015-05-13 Thread Daniel Krügler
2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459 Voted into the WP in Lenexa. Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk. What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite theta, as decided for by the

Re: [patch] std::polar requires non-negative rho

2015-05-13 Thread Marc Glisse
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel Krügler wrote: 2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459 Voted into the WP in Lenexa. Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk. What about assertions regarding

Re: [patch] std::polar requires non-negative rho

2015-05-13 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 13/05/15 15:36 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote: 2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459 Voted into the WP in Lenexa. Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk. What about assertions regarding

Re: [patch] std::polar requires non-negative rho

2015-05-13 Thread Daniel Krügler
2015-05-13 16:05 GMT+02:00 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr: On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel Krügler wrote: What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite theta, as decided for by the LWG 2439? non-NAN rho is already covered by rho = 0. Agreed on that. - Daniel