Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-16 Thread Ilya Verbin
On 15 Jan 09:40, Richard Biener wrote: Note that we still have the issue that we want to exercise both WHOPR and non-WHOPR in the testsuite but all testcases are so small that we'd automagically would use non-WHOPR mode (if such automatism was implemented...). Several tests in libgomp

Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/14/2015 01:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Whenever I get to the LTO part of this project, I promise to start documenting things better. This whole thing is a mystery. Well - mostly to me as well ;) I'll let Honza

Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-14 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 01/14/2015 01:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Whenever I get to the LTO part of this project, I promise to start documenting things better. This whole thing is a mystery. Well - mostly to me as well ;) I'll let Honza answer this... Ha, you're being too modest! I get the feeling that no

Re: [patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote: Hi Richard. I'm chasing my tail here looking at an LTO + debug problem, and for the life of me I can't figure out how all this partition business affects a symbol's `analyzed' bit. Anyways... the documentation for all

[patch] update function comments for lto_symtab_encoder_encode_*

2015-01-13 Thread Aldy Hernandez
Hi Richard. I'm chasing my tail here looking at an LTO + debug problem, and for the life of me I can't figure out how all this partition business affects a symbol's `analyzed' bit. Anyways... the documentation for all these functions is wrong. Can you look at this patch and tell me if it