On Sep 17, 2014, at 12:55 , Kai Tietz wrote:
>> We probably could twist our configuration scripts to experiment the -w64-
>> variant as well. Might take a bit of time though.
>
> Well, would be interesting.
Yes, I agree. I'll open an internal discussion to pursue this track.
> As you are u
2014-09-17 12:38 GMT+02:00 Olivier Hainque :
> Hello Kai,
>
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:52 , Kai Tietz wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay in review.
>
> No problem at all. Thanks for your feedback :)
>
>> Patch looks ok. Have you just tested
>> -pc- variant, or also -w64- one?
>
> Just the -pc- vari
Hello Kai,
On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:52 , Kai Tietz wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in review.
No problem at all. Thanks for your feedback :)
> Patch looks ok. Have you just tested
> -pc- variant, or also -w64- one?
Just the -pc- variant, by our nightly builders.
We probably could twist our c
Hello Oliver,
Sorry for the delay in review. Patch looks ok. Have you just tested
-pc- variant, or also -w64- one?
Thanks,
Kai
Hello,
Ping #3 for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg00237.html
Thanks in advance for your feedback,
With Kind Regards,
Olivier
On Jul 3, 2014, at 16:57 , Olivier Hainque wrote:
> From gcc/i386/config/mingw32.h, STARTFILE_SPEC and ENDFILE_SPEC include
> crtbegin.o and crtend.o unc
