Re: [ping] [patch 4/5] fix bugs with -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and packed structures

2013-06-24 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 06/24/2013 06:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 06/16/2013 01:08 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and

Re: [ping] [patch 4/5] fix bugs with -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and packed structures

2013-06-24 Thread Richard Biener
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > On 06/16/2013 01:08 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> >> This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted >> for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and >> 56997. A secondary goal of this pat

[ping] [patch 4/5] fix bugs with -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and packed structures

2013-06-23 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 06/16/2013 01:08 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote: This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and 56997. A secondary goal of this patch was making the bitfield store and extract code follow similar logic