Re: [testsuite, i386] Reimplementing array comparison in avx2-vpop-check.h

2013-04-18 Thread Kirill Yukhin
> OK with that change. Hi, Checked into trunk: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2013-04/msg00763.html Thanks, K

Re: [testsuite, i386] Reimplementing array comparison in avx2-vpop-check.h

2013-04-18 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote: > Yep, that also works. > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > index 64ffe8f..7efc3f1 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ > +2013-04-18 Grigoriy Kraynov

Re: [testsuite, i386] Reimplementing array comparison in avx2-vpop-check.h

2013-04-18 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
Yep, that also works. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 64ffe8f..7efc3f1 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2013-04-18 Grigoriy Kraynov + + * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpop-check.h: volatility is casted away in

Re: [testsuite, i386] Reimplementing array comparison in avx2-vpop-check.h

2013-04-11 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote: > Hi, > > Usually does not include but on bionic it is > historically included. memcmp() reacts on a volatile argument > differently, depending on whether is included or not. If it > is included, then the compiler will generate a warnin

[testsuite, i386] Reimplementing array comparison in avx2-vpop-check.h

2013-04-11 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
Hi, Usually does not include but on bionic it is historically included. memcmp() reacts on a volatile argument differently, depending on whether is included or not. If it is included, then the compiler will generate a warning: warning: passing argument 2 of 'memcmp' discards 'volatile' qualifie