Hi Christophe,
On 04/01/16 14:21, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 4 January 2016 at 15:20, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 18 December 2015 at 15:16, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 17/12/15 22:17, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
Here is an updated version of this patch.
I did test it with
-mthum
On 4 January 2016 at 15:20, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 18 December 2015 at 15:16, Kyrill Tkachov
> wrote:
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>>
>> On 17/12/15 22:17, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is an updated version of this patch.
>>> I did test it with
>>> -mthumb/-march=armv8-a/-mfpu=cry
On 18 December 2015 at 15:16, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>
> On 17/12/15 22:17, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is an updated version of this patch.
>> I did test it with
>> -mthumb/-march=armv8-a/-mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8/-mfloat-abi=hard in
>> addition to my usual set
Hi Christophe,
On 17/12/15 22:17, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
Here is an updated version of this patch.
I did test it with
-mthumb/-march=armv8-a/-mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8/-mfloat-abi=hard in
addition to my usual set of options.
Compared to the previous version:
- I added some doc in sourcebui
Hi,
Here is an updated version of this patch.
I did test it with
-mthumb/-march=armv8-a/-mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8/-mfloat-abi=hard in
addition to my usual set of options.
Compared to the previous version:
- I added some doc in sourcebuild.texi
- I no longer modify arm_vfp_ok...
- I replaced all
On 10 December 2015 at 14:14, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
> On 10/12/15 13:04, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 10 December 2015 at 13:30, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Christophe,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/12/15 11:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 8 December 2015 at 11:50, Kyrill Tkachov
w
On 10/12/15 13:04, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 10 December 2015 at 13:30, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 08/12/15 11:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 8 December 2015 at 11:50, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 27/11/15 13:00, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
After the recent commi
On 10 December 2015 at 13:30, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>
> On 08/12/15 11:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 8 December 2015 at 11:50, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Christophe,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27/11/15 13:00, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
After the recent co
Hi Christophe,
On 08/12/15 11:18, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 8 December 2015 at 11:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi Christophe,
On 27/11/15 13:00, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
After the recent commits from Christian adding target attributes
support for ARM FPU settings, I've noticed that some of
On 8 December 2015 at 11:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>
> On 27/11/15 13:00, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> After the recent commits from Christian adding target attributes
>> support for ARM FPU settings, I've noticed that some of the tests
>> were failing because of inco
Hi Christophe,
On 27/11/15 13:00, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi,
After the recent commits from Christian adding target attributes
support for ARM FPU settings, I've noticed that some of the tests
were failing because of incorrect assumptions wrt to the default
cpu/fpu/float-abi of the compiler.
T
Ping?
On 27 November 2015 at 14:00, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After the recent commits from Christian adding target attributes
> support for ARM FPU settings, I've noticed that some of the tests
> were failing because of incorrect assumptions wrt to the default
> cpu/fpu/float-abi of the
Hi,
After the recent commits from Christian adding target attributes
support for ARM FPU settings, I've noticed that some of the tests
were failing because of incorrect assumptions wrt to the default
cpu/fpu/float-abi of the compiler.
This patch fixes the problems I've noticed in the following w
13 matches
Mail list logo