Rainer,
This patch is completely wrong and unacceptable because your test
applies too generally. Why, exactly, is it appropriate to assume that
the "-nH" assembler command line option means the same thing on all
systems and one wants to clear HW capabilities on all systems?
Because it is not appr
Il 12/09/2012 11:26, Rainer Orth ha scritto:
> Since the use of rdrand was introduced in src/c++11/random.cc, all
> execution tests involving libstdc++.so.6 fail on Solaris 10 and 11/x86
> with a sufficiently recent native assembler that supports rdrand: either
> Solaris 10/x86 patch 119961-11 or S
Since the use of rdrand was introduced in src/c++11/random.cc, all
execution tests involving libstdc++.so.6 fail on Solaris 10 and 11/x86
with a sufficiently recent native assembler that supports rdrand: either
Solaris 10/x86 patch 119961-11 or Solaris 11.1 builds (haven't checked
which one). The
