On 12/10/2015 05:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
If not reaching
if (TREE_CODE (origvar) == SSA_NAME)
{
gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (var) != VAR_DECL
|| (!DECL_EXTERNAL (var)
&& !DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (var)
&& !TREE_STATIC (var)
>>> On 10.12.15 at 14:53, wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 01:38 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- 2015-12-09/gcc/cfgexpand.c
>> +++ 2015-12-09/gcc/cfgexpand.c
>> @@ -1544,12 +1544,15 @@ static HOST_WIDE_INT
>> expand_one_var (tree var, bool toplevel, bool really_expand)
>> {
>> unsigned int align = BIT
On 12/10/2015 01:38 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
* cfgexpand.c (expand_one_var): Exclude static and external
variables when adjusting stack alignment related state.
gcc/testsuite/
2015-12-10 Jan Beulich
* gcc.c-torture/execute/stkalign.c: New.
--- 2015-12-09/gcc/cfgexpand
Function (or more narrow) scope static variables (as well as others not
placed on the stack) should also not have any effect on the stack
alignment. I noticed the issue first with Linux'es dynamic_pr_debug()
construct using an 8-byte aligned sub-file-scope local variable.
According to my checking
