On 07/10/14 08:39 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
OK, here is a patch for both using typename as a class key for
template template parms and for __has_include, etc.
Are these too wordy?
They look OK to me, although you say "__has_include_next and
__has_include_next" in both places, the first sh
On 10/02/2014 10:24 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 10:09 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :
On 02/10/14 10:09 -0400, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :-(
Thank you! I tried to do this and couldn't fo
On 10/02/2014 06:14 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :-(
Thank you! I tried to do this and couldn't for permissions. I'm
probably not doing it right.
On 02/10/14 11:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
And fix a markup error that I expected xmllint to catch :-(
Index: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/ch
Note Ed's recent changes. Committed to CVS.
Index: htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.12 changes.html
--- htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html 1 Oct 2014 08:2
