While reading through the GCC 4.7 changes.html, I noticed a couple of
nits that this patch fixes. It's mostly wording and grammar changes (so
I may well be wrong and would appreciate a native speaker having a look ;-)
Ok to install?
Beyond what I've changed, two items could perhaps do with bette
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
> While reading through the GCC 4.7 changes.html, I noticed a couple of
> nits that this patch fixes. It's mostly wording and grammar changes (so
> I may well be wrong and would appreciate a native speaker having a look
This looks good in general, thanks
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> While reading through the GCC 4.7 changes.html, I noticed a couple of
>> nits that this patch fixes. It's mostly wording and grammar changes (so
>> I may well be wrong and would appreciate a native speaker having a look
>
> T
Gerald Pfeifer writes:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> While reading through the GCC 4.7 changes.html, I noticed a couple of
>> nits that this patch fixes. It's mostly wording and grammar changes (so
>> I may well be wrong and would appreciate a native speaker having a look
>
> T
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Indeed: neither the original nor my patch were right here. I've updated
> my patch to include the correct syntax.
>
> Ok now?
Oh, yes. You just could have gone ahead. :-)
Gerald
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
> One issue I forgot: there are currently two instances of the long form
> of the bugzilla URLs. Shouldn't we better use http://gcc.gnu.org/PR
> here?
Good idea, yes. Changed thusly.
Gerald
Index: gcc-4.7/changes.html
