> LGTM.
Thanks. However, I overlooked an issue with pathologically large frames
(larger than SEH_MAX_FRAME_SIZE, i.e. 2GB and for which we cannot emit CFI
directives) that is visible in the gnat.dg testsuite under the form of an ICE.
Tested on x86_64-w64-mingw32, applied on mainline/10/9
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 5:14 PM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this wrong-code PR for the C++ compiler on x86-64/Windows is a regression
> in GCC 9 and later, but the underlying issue has probably been there since
> SEH was implemented and is exposed by this comment in config/i386/winnt.c:
>
>
Hi,
this wrong-code PR for the C++ compiler on x86-64/Windows is a regression
in GCC 9 and later, but the underlying issue has probably been there since
SEH was implemented and is exposed by this comment in config/i386/winnt.c:
/* SEH records saves relative to the "current" stack pointer,
