2016-06-01 13:06 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> 2016-05-31 19:15 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
Hi Uros,
Here is initial patch to improve performance of 64-bit integer
a
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2016-05-31 19:15 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
>>> Hi Uros,
>>>
>>> Here is initial patch to improve performance of 64-bit integer
>>> arithmetic in 32-bit mode. We discovered that gcc is
2016-05-31 19:15 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
>> Hi Uros,
>>
>> Here is initial patch to improve performance of 64-bit integer
>> arithmetic in 32-bit mode. We discovered that gcc is significantly
>> behind icc and clang on rsa benchmark from ee
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Hi Uros,
>
> Here is initial patch to improve performance of 64-bit integer
> arithmetic in 32-bit mode. We discovered that gcc is significantly
> behind icc and clang on rsa benchmark from eembc2.0 suite.
> Te problem function looks like
>
Hi Uros,
Here is initial patch to improve performance of 64-bit integer
arithmetic in 32-bit mode. We discovered that gcc is significantly
behind icc and clang on rsa benchmark from eembc2.0 suite.
Te problem function looks like
typedef unsigned long long ull;
typedef unsigned long ul;
ul mul_add(
