Re: About 31109 - gprofng not built and installed in a combined binutils+gcc build

Richard Biener writes: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 4:46 AM Vladimir Mezentsev > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I asked in https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109 >> > I prepared a patch for the releases/gcc-13 branch. >> > Richard Biener rejected my patch for >> this branch. >> > Which

Re: About 31109 - gprofng not built and installed in a combined binutils+gcc build

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 4:46 AM Vladimir Mezentsev wrote: > > Hi, > > I asked in https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109 > > I prepared a patch for the releases/gcc-13 branch. > > Richard Biener rejected my patch for > this branch. > > Which branch should I use? master, trunk or

About 31109 - gprofng not built and installed in a combined binutils+gcc build

Hi, I asked in https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109 > I prepared a patch for the releases/gcc-13 branch. > Richard Biener rejected my patch for this branch. > Which branch should I use? master, trunk or something else? Do you really need gprofng in the gcc repo ? if yes:   th