Hi!
On Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:55:53 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > OK for trunk?
>
> Ok.
Thanks for the review. Committed in r228282:
commit e344dc2e94177f522fe8d62fe95ec2d1687e017a
Author: tschwinge
Date: Wed Sep 30 08:44:49 2015 +
Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-s
Hi!
> > OK for trunk?
Ok.
Jakub
> Hi!
> Ping.
OK for the Fortran part, though I suspect you need Jakub to approve it as well.
FX
\]+\\\) object when
> > > \\\[0x\[0-9a-f\]+..0x\[0-9a-f\]+\\\) is already mapped" }
> > > +/* { dg-shouldfail "" } */
> >
> > It once occurred to me that it's also a good idea to verify that we're
> > actually reaching the expected ch
we're
> actually reaching the expected checkpoint before terminating -- OK to
> commit?
OK for trunk?
commit 97f963dc86199ef2237fffa6293d4dfdacbd1e59
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date: Fri Aug 14 17:51:03 2015 +0200
Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-shouldfail tests
That is, verify t
> (Can a Fortran person please comment on this: as it's nontrivial to write
> to stderr, let's just write to stdout followed by a flush, which does
> have the same ordering effect -- OK?)
Although there are no absolute guarantees on flushing, it should work in
practice.
Note that the FLUSH subro
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> (Can a Fortran person please comment on this: as it's nontrivial to write
> to stderr, let's just write to stdout followed by a flush, which does
> have the same ordering effect -- OK?)
If you want to write to stderr, with gfortran
ct when
> \\\[0x\[0-9a-f\]+..0x\[0-9a-f\]+\\\) is already mapped" }
> +/* { dg-shouldfail "" } */
It once occurred to me that it's also a good idea to verify that we're
actually reaching the expected checkpoint before terminating -- OK to
commit?
commit 105522789919a4
