Re: Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-shouldfail tests (was: [PR testsuite/65205] Fix dg-shouldfail usage in OpenACC libgomp tests)

2015-08-14 Thread FX
> (Can a Fortran person please comment on this: as it's nontrivial to write > to stderr, let's just write to stdout followed by a flush, which does > have the same ordering effect -- OK?) Although there are no absolute guarantees on flushing, it should work in practice. Note that the FLUSH subro

Re: Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-shouldfail tests (was: [PR testsuite/65205] Fix dg-shouldfail usage in OpenACC libgomp tests)

2015-08-14 Thread Janne Blomqvist
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > (Can a Fortran person please comment on this: as it's nontrivial to write > to stderr, let's just write to stdout followed by a flush, which does > have the same ordering effect -- OK?) If you want to write to stderr, with gfortran

Add checkpoint to libgomp dg-shouldfail tests (was: [PR testsuite/65205] Fix dg-shouldfail usage in OpenACC libgomp tests)

2015-08-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! (Can a Fortran person please comment on this: as it's nontrivial to write to stderr, let's just write to stdout followed by a flush, which does have the same ordering effect -- OK?) On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:47:03 +0200, I wrote: > Here is a patch, prepared by Jim Norris, to fix dg-shouldfail us