Hi Jakub!
On 2023-06-30T18:37:59+0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 08:45:38PM +0800, Kito Cheng wrote:
>> Hmmm, I think maybe what we need is to leverage C++ language features
>> to declare enum with underlying types like that:
>>
>> enum machine_mode : uint16_t
>
> What would
On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 08:45:38PM +0800, Kito Cheng wrote:
> Hmmm, I think maybe what we need is to leverage C++ language features
> to declare enum with underlying types like that:
>
> enum machine_mode : uint16_t
What would be the advantage of doing that?
I mean, on most hosts using unsigned r
Hi!
On 2023-06-30T20:45:38+0800, Kito Cheng wrote:
>> On 2023-05-13T16:44:41+0800, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
>> wrote:
>> > Tried this patch and I ran into some issues, some variables are using
>> > unsigned char to hold machine mode and will have problems when the
>> > number of modes is larg
> On 2023-05-13T16:44:41+0800, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Tried this patch and I ran into some issues, some variables are using
> > unsigned char to hold machine mode and will have problems when the
> > number of modes is larger than 255...
> >
> > And here is the fix:
>
> > --- a/gc
Hi!
On 2023-05-13T16:44:41+0800, Kito Cheng via Gcc-patches
wrote:
> Tried this patch and I ran into some issues, some variables are using
> unsigned char to hold machine mode and will have problems when the
> number of modes is larger than 255...
>
> And here is the fix:
> --- a/gcc/genmodes.c
