Re: Another ptx offloading patch

2015-02-20 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 02/10/2015 11:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Bernds patch is ok with the unrelated gcc.c hunk removed. Committed in the following form (adapted to some recent changes) after bootstrap and retest. Bernd Index: gcc/ChangeLog

Re: Another ptx offloading patch

2015-02-10 Thread Richard Biener
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:45:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/20/14 05:33, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Now that I've managed to put together and test all

Re: Another ptx offloading patch

2015-02-10 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 02/10/2015 11:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Bernds patch is ok with the unrelated gcc.c hunk removed. Thanks. I'm assuming this is for the next stage 1? Bernd

Re: Another ptx offloading patch

2015-02-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:06:15PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote: On 02/10/2015 11:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Bernds patch is ok with the unrelated gcc.c hunk removed. Thanks. I'm assuming this is for the next stage 1? No, for current trunk, we don't want to ship with offloading to nvptx

Re: Another ptx offloading patch

2015-02-04 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:45:40AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/20/14 05:33, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Now that I've managed to put together and test all the submitted OpenACC patches I found there was one piece missing.

Re: Another ptx offloading patch

2015-01-16 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/20/14 05:33, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Now that I've managed to put together and test all the submitted OpenACC patches I found there was one piece missing. The problem is that omp-low on the host likes to generate function

Re: Another ptx offloading patch

2015-01-15 Thread Jeff Law
On 11/20/14 05:33, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Now that I've managed to put together and test all the submitted OpenACC patches I found there was one piece missing. The problem is that omp-low on the host likes to generate function names like _main._omp_fn. On ptx, the dot is not allowed in

Another ptx offloading patch

2014-11-20 Thread Bernd Schmidt
Now that I've managed to put together and test all the submitted OpenACC patches I found there was one piece missing. The problem is that omp-low on the host likes to generate function names like _main._omp_fn. On ptx, the dot is not allowed in identifiers, so we have to rewrite this to use a