Re: BRIG FE testsuite: Fix all dump-scans (Was: Re: drop -aux{dir,base}, revamp -dump{dir,base})

2020-06-12 Thread Mike Stump via Gcc-patches
On Jun 11, 2020, at 7:28 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09 2020, Mike Stump wrote: >> I think I'd prefer the fix on the other side, if reasonable. I'd give >> them some time to see about a fix there before selecting this patch. > > given Alexandre's email, are you OK with the patch?

Re: BRIG FE testsuite: Fix all dump-scans (Was: Re: drop -aux{dir, base}, revamp -dump{dir, base})

2020-06-11 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi Mike, On Tue, Jun 09 2020, Mike Stump wrote: > I think I'd prefer the fix on the other side, if reasonable. I'd give > them some time to see about a fix there before selecting this patch. given Alexandre's email, are you OK with the patch? It essentially manually keeps the input name "rootna

Re: BRIG FE testsuite: Fix all dump-scans (Was: Re: drop -aux{dir,base}, revamp -dump{dir,base})

2020-06-09 Thread Mike Stump via Gcc-patches
I think I'd prefer the fix on the other side, if reasonable. I'd give them some time to see about a fix there before selecting this patch. On Jun 9, 2020, at 5:42 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09 2020, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> On 2020-05-26T04:08:44-0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> T

BRIG FE testsuite: Fix all dump-scans (Was: Re: drop -aux{dir, base}, revamp -dump{dir, base})

2020-06-09 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Tue, Jun 09 2020, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On 2020-05-26T04:08:44-0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> Thanks, here's the combined patch I'm checking in. >> >> revamp dump and aux output names > > For BRIG (HSAIL) front end testing, I'm see a lot of failures like: > > Running [...]/