On 3/6/20 11:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 06/03/20 10:09 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 06/03/20 07:06 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I started to work on ranges::equal to find out if what I am trying
to do is totally silly.
With this patch ranges::equal is in pare with std::equal
speci
On 06/03/20 10:09 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 06/03/20 07:06 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I started to work on ranges::equal to find out if what I am trying
to do is totally silly.
With this patch ranges::equal is in pare with std::equal
specializations that is to say that it correctly
On 06/03/20 07:06 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I started to work on ranges::equal to find out if what I am trying to
do is totally silly.
With this patch ranges::equal is in pare with std::equal
specializations that is to say that it correctly deals with Debug mode
or std::deque iterators.
I started to work on ranges::equal to find out if what I am trying to do
is totally silly.
With this patch ranges::equal is in pare with std::equal specializations
that is to say that it correctly deals with Debug mode or std::deque
iterators.
Once below patch is in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
I started to work on ranges::equal to find out if what I am trying to do
is totally silly.
With this patch ranges::equal is in pare with std::equal specializations
that is to say that it correctly deals with Debug mode or std::deque
iterators.
Once below patch is in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
