On 3 July 2013 22:42, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/27/2013 11:24 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Finally, should we put a line for thins in the 4.9 changes page?
PING! Is adding links to the C++2014 library page OK?
From http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.9/changes.html? Yes, that's OK, the
source for
On 06/27/2013 11:24 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/27/2013 07:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 June 2013 16:45, 3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 June 2013 16:45, 3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
Excellent, thanks!
Tested with xmllint. Are there any other tests I should do?
The makefile
On 06/27/2013 07:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 June 2013 16:45, 3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
Excellent, thanks!
Tested with xmllint. Are
On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25 June 2013 16:45, 3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
Excellent, thanks!
Tested with xmllint. Are there any other tests I should do?
The makefile target to check the docbook manual is:
make