70353 is a problem with the function-local static declaration of
__func__. Normally constexpr functions can't have local statics, so
this is only an issue with __func__. Meanwhile, core issue 1962 looks
like it's going to be resolved by changing __func__ et al to be prvalue
constants of type
Hi Jason,
The following tests for g++.dg/ext/fnname5.C fail on darwin
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/fnname5.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler .string\\t"foo"
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/fnname5.C -std=c++11 scan-assembler .string\\t"void
A::foo(int)"
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/fnname5.C -std=c++14 scan-assembler .string\
On 2016.03.25 at 17:29 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> 70353 is a problem with the function-local static declaration of __func__.
> Normally constexpr functions can't have local statics, so this is only an
> issue with __func__. Meanwhile, core issue 1962 looks like it's going to be
> resolved by ch
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:29:26PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> 70353 is a problem with the function-local static declaration of
> __func__. Normally constexpr functions can't have local statics, so
> this is only an issue with __func__. Meanwhile, core issue 1962 looks
> like it's going to b
OK, thanks.
Jason
> Le 28 mars 2016 à 14:55, Jason Merrill a écrit :
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> Jason
Does it mean that I should commit the patch?
Dominique
On 03/28/2016 09:02 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
Le 28 mars 2016 à 14:55, Jason Merrill a écrit :
OK, thanks.
Jason
Does it mean that I should commit the patch?
Please.
Jason
> Le 28 mars 2016 à 15:11, Jason Merrill a écrit :
>
> On 03/28/2016 09:02 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
>>
>>> Le 28 mars 2016 à 14:55, Jason Merrill a écrit :
>>>
>>> OK, thanks.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>
>> Does it mean that I should commit the patch?
>
> Please.
Revision 234504.
Dominique
