On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 07:22:17PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:20 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 1/24/19 7:17 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Merrill
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 4:20 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 1/24/19 7:17 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:57 PM Marek Polacek
> > > >
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 10:05:00AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/24/19 7:17 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:57 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:00:36AM -0500, Jason
On 1/24/19 7:17 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:57 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:00:36AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
I was talking about digest_init, not reshape_init. digest_init calls
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 03:34:04PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:57 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:00:36AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > I was talking about digest_init, not reshape_init. digest_init calls
> > >
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:57 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:00:36AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > I was talking about digest_init, not reshape_init. digest_init calls
> > convert_for_initialization.
>
> /facepalm
>
> So yes, digest_init calls convert_for_initialization
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:00:36AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I was talking about digest_init, not reshape_init. digest_init calls
> convert_for_initialization.
/facepalm
So yes, digest_init calls convert_for_initialization which will end up
calling perform_implicit_conversion_flags which
On 1/22/19 4:10 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:14:53PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/18/19 9:12 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:17:29PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/17/19 2:09 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch ought to fix the rest of 78244,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:14:53PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/18/19 9:12 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:17:29PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 1/17/19 2:09 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > This patch ought to fix the rest of 78244, a missing narrowing warning
On 1/18/19 9:12 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:17:29PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 1/17/19 2:09 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch ought to fix the rest of 78244, a missing narrowing warning in
decltype.
As I explained in Bugzilla, there can be three scenarios:
1)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 04:17:29PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/17/19 2:09 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This patch ought to fix the rest of 78244, a missing narrowing warning in
> > decltype.
> >
> > As I explained in Bugzilla, there can be three scenarios:
> >
> > 1) decltype is in a
On 1/17/19 2:09 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch ought to fix the rest of 78244, a missing narrowing warning in
decltype.
As I explained in Bugzilla, there can be three scenarios:
1) decltype is in a template and it has no dependent expressions, which
is the problematical case.
This patch ought to fix the rest of 78244, a missing narrowing warning in
decltype.
As I explained in Bugzilla, there can be three scenarios:
1) decltype is in a template and it has no dependent expressions, which
is the problematical case. finish_compound_literal just returns the
compound
13 matches
Mail list logo