On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:10 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 02:20:53PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 8/19/19 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 06:20:20PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 8/16/19 2:29 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > > This
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 02:20:53PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/19/19 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 06:20:20PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 8/16/19 2:29 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > This patch is an attempt to fix the annoying -Wunused-but-set-*
> >
On 8/19/19 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 06:20:20PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/16/19 2:29 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch is an attempt to fix the annoying -Wunused-but-set-* warnings that
tend to occur with constexpr if. When we have something like
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 06:20:20PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/16/19 2:29 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > This patch is an attempt to fix the annoying -Wunused-but-set-* warnings
> > that
> > tend to occur with constexpr if. When we have something like
> >
> >template < typename T >
> >
On 8/16/19 2:29 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This patch is an attempt to fix the annoying -Wunused-but-set-* warnings that
tend to occur with constexpr if. When we have something like
template < typename T >
int f(T v){
if constexpr(sizeof(T) == sizeof(int)){
return v;
This patch is an attempt to fix the annoying -Wunused-but-set-* warnings that
tend to occur with constexpr if. When we have something like
template < typename T >
int f(T v){
if constexpr(sizeof(T) == sizeof(int)){
return v;
}else{
return 0;
}
}
and
