On 3/13/19 3:32 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:15:25PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/12/19 5:42 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 04:07:56PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/12/19 3:59 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
As Barry explained in the PR, lambda
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 02:15:25PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/12/19 5:42 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 04:07:56PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 3/12/19 3:59 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > As Barry explained in the PR, lambda capture is one of
> > > >
> > >
On 3/12/19 5:42 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 04:07:56PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/12/19 3:59 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
As Barry explained in the PR, lambda capture is one of
simple-capture ...[opt]
...[opt] init-capture
where init-capture requires an
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 04:07:56PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/12/19 3:59 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > As Barry explained in the PR, lambda capture is one of
> >
> >simple-capture ...[opt]
> >...[opt] init-capture
> >
> > where init-capture requires an initializer. Here we have
>
On 3/12/19 3:59 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
As Barry explained in the PR, lambda capture is one of
simple-capture ...[opt]
...[opt] init-capture
where init-capture requires an initializer. Here we have
[...xs...]
which is ill-formed as it's mingling both of these.
As Barry explained in the PR, lambda capture is one of
simple-capture ...[opt]
...[opt] init-capture
where init-capture requires an initializer. Here we have
[...xs...]
which is ill-formed as it's mingling both of these.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? Or should
