The comment says this test is supposed to prevent "a narrower
operation than requested", but it actually only allows a larger
subreg, not one the same size. Fix that.
Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux. OK for stage1?
Note that this bug was found when investigating why gcc-6 doe
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:46:42AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> The comment says this test is supposed to prevent "a narrower
> operation than requested", but it actually only allows a larger
> subreg, not one the same size. Fix that.
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux. OK for
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 06:02:35PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:46:42AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > The comment says this test is supposed to prevent "a narrower
> > operation than requested", but it actually only allows a larger
> > subreg, not one the same size.
On 01/31/2016 03:16 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
The comment says this test is supposed to prevent "a narrower
operation than requested", but it actually only allows a larger
subreg, not one the same size. Fix that.
Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux. OK for stage1?
Note that this bu
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:27:36AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/31/2016 03:16 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> >The comment says this test is supposed to prevent "a narrower
> >operation than requested", but it actually only allows a larger
> >subreg, not one the same size. Fix that.
> >
> >Bootstrapped
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 08:46:42AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> The comment says this test is supposed to prevent "a narrower
> operation than requested", but it actually only allows a larger
> subreg, not one the same size. Fix that.
>
> Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux. OK for
On 01/31/2016 03:16 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
The comment says this test is supposed to prevent "a narrower
operation than requested", but it actually only allows a larger
subreg, not one the same size. Fix that.
Bootstrapped and regression tested powerpc64-linux. OK for stage1?
Note that this bu