Re: Combined constructs' clause splitting

2015-11-18 Thread Cesar Philippidis
On 11/08/2015 07:45 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 07/11/15 12:45, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis >> wrote: >>> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my >>> front end changes from trunk.

Re: Combined constructs' clause splitting

2015-11-18 Thread Tom de Vries
On 19/11/15 01:03, Cesar Philippidis wrote: On 11/08/2015 07:45 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: On 07/11/15 12:45, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote: I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my

Re: Combined constructs' clause splitting

2015-11-08 Thread Tom de Vries
On 07/11/15 12:45, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote: I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my front end changes from trunk. Note that I found a regression while testing, which is also

Combined constructs' clause splitting (was: [gomp4] backport trunk FE changes)

2015-11-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my > front end changes from trunk. Note that I found a regression while > testing, which is also present in trunk. It looks like >

Re: Combined constructs' clause splitting

2015-11-07 Thread Cesar Philippidis
On 11/07/2015 03:45 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:31:23 -0800, Cesar Philippidis > wrote: >> I've applied this patch to gomp-4_0-branch which backports most of my >> front end changes from trunk. Note that I found a regression while >>