On 10/5/12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Oct 3, 2012 Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe
> > template hash table. Constify member function parameters that
> > can be const. Correct a couple of expressions in formerly
> > uninstantiated templates.
> >
On Oct 5, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>
>>> For many people the time to compile (almost) empty file is very
>>> important, we are already bad about that right now, initializing
>>> too much stuff dynamically is going to make it w
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> You are changing a hashtable used by fold checking, did you test
>> with fold checking enabled?
>
> One small thinko fixed. Patch passes tests.
>
>> The cfg.c, dse.c and hash-table.h parts are ok for
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> For many people the time to compile (almost) empty file is very
>> important, we are already bad about that right now, initializing
>> too much stuff dynamically is going to make it worse.
>
> So far, we are looking at dynamic initializatio
On 10/5/12, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:59:18PM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > With the constructor, you don't have to remember and you don't
> > have to type more. If you have a variable, you know that it is
> > properly initialized.
>
> But we really don't want hundreds
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:59:18PM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> With the constructor, you don't have to remember and you don't
> have to type more. If you have a variable, you know that it is
> properly initialized.
But we really don't want hundreds or thousands of dynamic constructors
for glob
Could you please review the patch at
http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg40961.html?
On 10/3/12, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Sorry, one more time with the right file contents.
>
> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> You are changing a hashtable used by fold checking, did you te
On 10/5/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> On 10/4/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> >> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> >> > > Change more non-GTY hash tab
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 10/4/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> >> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> >> > > Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe
> >> > > templ
On 10/4/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> > > Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe
>> > > template hash table. Constify member function parameters th
On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > > Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe
> > > template hash table. Constify member function parameters that
> > > can be const. Correct a couple o
Sorry, one more time with the right file contents.
On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> You are changing a hashtable used by fold checking, did you test
> with fold checking enabled?
One small thinko fixed. Patch passes tests.
> The cfg.c, dse.c and hash-table.h parts are ok for trunk, I'll
>
On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>
>> Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe template hash
>> table.
>> Constify member function parameters that can be const.
>> Correct a couple of expressions in formerly uninstantiated templates.
>
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 09:54:45AM -0700, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 10/2/12, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > On Oct 2, 2012 Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > > On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > You are changing a hashtable used by fold checking, did you
> > > > test with fold checking enabled?
>
On 10/2/12, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Oct 2, 2012 Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > You are changing a hashtable used by fold checking, did you
> > > test with fold checking enabled?
> >
> > I didn't know I had to do anything beyond the normal make check.
> >
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> You are changing a hashtable used by fold checking, did you test
>> with fold checking enabled?
>
> I didn't know I had to do anything beyond the normal make check.
> What do I do?
Fold checking is
On 10/2/12, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> > Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe
> > template hash table. Constify member function parameters that
> > can be const. Correct a couple of expressions in formerly
> > uninstantiated template
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe template hash table.
> Constify member function parameters that can be const.
> Correct a couple of expressions in formerly uninstantiated templates.
>
> The new code is 0.362% faster in bootstrap
Change more non-GTY hash tables to use the new type-safe template hash table.
Constify member function parameters that can be const.
Correct a couple of expressions in formerly uninstantiated templates.
The new code is 0.362% faster in bootstrap, with a 99.5% confidence of
being faster.
Tested on
19 matches
Mail list logo
