On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I think it should go into 4.6.0 as well.
>
> Seconded.
I have now committed both patches to 4.6 branch after bootstrap there with
no regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and applied this release notes
patch to note that these changes to semanti
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 01:20:41PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Joseph S. Myers
> wrote:
> > This week's London WG14 meeting decided that typedef redefinition
> > should not be allowed in the case of variably modified types. This
> > patch implements this, gi
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> This week's London WG14 meeting decided that typedef redefinition
> should not be allowed in the case of variably modified types. This
> patch implements this, giving an error for such redefinitions.
>
> Bootstrapped with no regressions o
This week's London WG14 meeting decided that typedef redefinition
should not be allowed in the case of variably modified types. This
patch implements this, giving an error for such redefinitions.
Bootstrapped with no regressions on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied
to mainline. Any comments fro
