Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-16 Thread Marek Polacek
Ping^2. On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 03:50:02PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > Jason: ping. > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:35:39PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:01:26PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as >

Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-16 Thread Joseph Myers
The changes to C++ option descriptions are OK in the absence of C++ front-end maintainer objections within 96 hours. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-09 Thread Marek Polacek
Jason: ping. On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:35:39PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:01:26PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as > > experimental in the --help text. This patch fixes this. > > > > Jason, note

Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 01.10.2015 19:01, Joseph Myers wrote: I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as experimental in the --help text. This patch fixes this. this seems to be true for the gcc-5 branch as well. Could you fix it there as well? Matthias

Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-02 Thread Marek Polacek
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:01:26PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as > experimental in the --help text. This patch fixes this. > > Jason, note that -std=gnu++11 and -std=gnu++14 still have that text, > contrary to the descriptions

Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-02 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 01.10.2015 19:01, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as > > experimental in the --help text. This patch fixes this. > > this seems to be true for the gcc-5 branch as well. Could you fix it

Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-02 Thread Marek Polacek
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:35:39PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:01:26PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as > > experimental in the --help text. This patch fixes this. > > > > Jason, note that

Re: Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-02 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:35:39PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 05:01:26PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > > I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as > > experimental in the --help text. This patch fixes this. > > > > Jason, note that

Do not describe -std=c11 etc. as experimental in c.opt help text

2015-10-01 Thread Joseph Myers
I noticed that c.opt still described -std=c11 and related options as experimental in the --help text. This patch fixes this. Jason, note that -std=gnu++11 and -std=gnu++14 still have that text, contrary to the descriptions of -std=c++11 and -std=c++14. Bootstrapped with no regressions on