Re: Do not imply -frename-registers by -fpeel-loops

2016-05-31 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > this patch makes -frename-registers independent with -fpeel-loops. > I think the original idea for building this in was the fact that loop peeling > creates > large basic blocks where scheduling matters. This is no longer true about > -fpeel-loops

Do not imply -frename-registers by -fpeel-loops

2016-05-31 Thread Jan Hubicka
Hi, this patch makes -frename-registers independent with -fpeel-loops. I think the original idea for building this in was the fact that loop peeling creates large basic blocks where scheduling matters. This is no longer true about -fpeel-loops because this happens only for complete peeling which