On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:30 AM HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
>
> Bin,
>
> I just tested your patch on current trunk. Here is my summary.
>
> 1. About some iv aren't moved out of inner loop (Lijia mentioned in his
> last email)
>
>[local count: 955630226]:
># l_32 = PHI <1(12), l_54(21)>
>#
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 4:31 AM HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Bin,
>
> I just tested your patch on current trunk. Here is my summary.
>
> 1. About some iv aren't moved out of inner loop (Lijia mentioned in his
> last email)
>
>[local count: 955630226]:
># l_32 = PHI <1(12),
Bin,
I just tested your patch on current trunk. Here is my summary.
1. About some iv aren't moved out of inner loop (Lijia mentioned in his
last email)
[local count: 955630226]:
# l_32 = PHI <1(12), l_54(21)>
# ivtmp_165 = PHI <_446(12), ivtmp_155(21)>
_26 = (integer(kind=8)) l_32;
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:42 PM HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to follow Lijia's work as I gained the performance benefit on
> some SPEC workloads by adding a im pass after loop interchange. Could
> you send me the latest patches? I could do further testing. Thanks a lot.
Hi,
Hmm, not
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:43 AM HAO CHEN GUI via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to follow Lijia's work as I gained the performance benefit on
> some SPEC workloads by adding a im pass after loop interchange. Could
> you send me the latest patches? I could do further testing. Thanks a lot.
Hi,
I want to follow Lijia's work as I gained the performance benefit on
some SPEC workloads by adding a im pass after loop interchange. Could
you send me the latest patches? I could do further testing. Thanks a lot.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-February/232091.html
