Re: Don't use pending_sizes list for C

2011-05-04 Thread Mike Stump
On May 4, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Following recent discussions of variable_size, this patch stops the C > front end from using the global pending_sizes list > Are the ObjC changes OK to commit? Ok. Don't forget about Objective-C++. It isn't the default.

Re: Don't use pending_sizes list for C

2011-05-04 Thread Eric Botcazou
> Following recent discussions of variable_size, this patch stops the C > front end from using the global pending_sizes list, instead using the > existing grokdeclarator support for tracking size expressions in the > one case where pending sizes were still needed. c_variable_size is > replaced by

Don't use pending_sizes list for C

2011-05-04 Thread Joseph S. Myers
Following recent discussions of variable_size, this patch stops the C front end from using the global pending_sizes list, instead using the existing grokdeclarator support for tracking size expressions in the one case where pending sizes were still needed. c_variable_size is replaced by a call to