hes/2023-February/611562.html
While revising it I realized that recursing for parameter
when gimplifying is incorrect for the same reason as recursing in
other cases (see the comment in gimplify_type_sizes). This lead
to PR109450.
>
> > Fix ICEs related to VM types in C [PR106465, P
ease give a reference to whatever previous patch posting / discussion
there may have been?
> Fix ICEs related to VM types in C [PR106465, PR107557, PR108424,
> PR109450]
108424 seems to be the wrong PR number.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
nd before),
though I wonder how much value considering something which didn't work
in GCC 4.0+ these days as a regression.
Also splitting them up if possible is always welcomed to be able to
review each thing separately.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> Fix ICEs related
Ok, here is another attempt on fixing issues with size expression.
Not all are regressions, but it does not make sense to try to split
it up.
Martin
Fix ICEs related to VM types in C [PR106465, PR107557, PR108424,
PR109450]
Size expressions were sometimes lost
