Re: Follow-up-fix to "[PATCH] Move PR84877 fix elsewhere (PR bootstrap/88450)"

2019-02-11 Thread Eric Botcazou
> To fix the r267812 incorrectness we need to use the *stored* > size, i.e. that which will be stored into using register-sized > writes. It's seems like the bug is just a typo, so the fix is > as simple as follows. Note the usage of "diff -U 10" to show > that size_stored is used in the "then"-a

Re: Follow-up-fix to "[PATCH] Move PR84877 fix elsewhere (PR bootstrap/88450)"

2019-02-10 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 02:05:11 +0100 > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson > Regtested on cris-elf, where it "introduces" gcc.dg/pr84877.c Correction: "no regressions" (not introduced by this proposed patch, I misread). brgds, H-P

Follow-up-fix to "[PATCH] Move PR84877 fix elsewhere (PR bootstrap/88450)"

2019-02-10 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:06:01 +0100 > From: Jakub Jelinek > 2019-01-09 Jakub Jelinek > > PR middle-end/84877 > PR bootstrap/88450 > * function.c (assign_stack_local_1): Revert the 2018-11-21 changes. > (assign_parm_setup_block): Do the argument slot realignment her