Steven Probably you mean the revised patch here:
Steven http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html
Steven The patch look OK to me but I can't approve it.
I'm sorry about the delay on this.
The libcpp bits are ok.
I can't approve the other parts.
I think new configure options
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Tom Tromey tro...@redhat.com wrote:
Steven Probably you mean the revised patch here:
Steven http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html
Steven The patch look OK to me but I can't approve it.
I'm sorry about the delay on this.
The libcpp bits
Ping, again
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html
--
Google UK Limited | Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham
Palace Road, London SW1W 9TQ | Registered in England Number: 3977902
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Simon Baldwin wrote:
Ping, again
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html
Probably you mean the revised patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00459.html
The patch look OK to me but I can't approve it.
Technically you're
