Re: GCN: Conditionalize 'define_expand "reduc__scal_"' on '!TARGET_RDNA2_PLUS' [PR113615]

h the attached "GCN: Conditionalize 'define_expand "reduc__scal_"' on '!TARGET_RDNA2_PLUS' [PR113615]"? Which of the 'assert's are worth keeping? Only tested 'vect.exp' for 'check-gcc-c' so fa

GCN: Conditionalize 'define_expand "reduc__scal_"' on '!TARGET_RDNA2_PLUS' [PR113615] (was: [patch] gcn/gcn-valu.md: Disable fold_left_plus for TARGET_RDNA2_PLUS [PR113615])

ut > vectorization and in the code path shown in the backtrace. > I can also confirm manually that it fixes the ICE I saw and > also the ICE for the testfile that Richard's PR shows at the > end of his backtrace. (-O3 is needed to trigger the ICE.) On top of that, OK to push the a