Committed the following...
2013-05-30 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
Implement N3642 - User-defined Literals for Standard Library Types
* include/bits/parse_numbers.h: New.
* include/std/chrono: Add duration literal operators.
* include/bits
Hi,
Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net ha scritto:
Committed the following...
Looks like great work, thanks! I'm still in vacations, and barely reading email
on a small screen, just wanted to point out that apparently the patch has a few
redundant inline preceding constexpr. Could you
, this builds and tests clean on x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Ed
2013-05-30 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
Implement N3642 - User-defined Literals for Standard Library Types
Implement N3660 - User-defined Literals for std::complex,
part 2 of UDL for Standard Library Types
2013/5/31 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net:
Greetings,
This patch implements N3642 - User-defined literals for
std::chrono::duration and std::basic_string
and N3660 - User-defined literals for std::complex.
N3660 was rejected during the Bristol meeting, the main reason being
the ugliness
/gnu.ver: Add literal operator symbols.
2013-05-30 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
Implement N3642 - User-defined Literals for Standard Library Types
* include/bits/parse_numbers.h: New.
* include/std/chrono: Add duration literal operators.
* include/bits
On 05/31/13, Ed Smith-Rowland3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
...
1. Put the precision first in upper case. As a matter of style I
prefer 123456L to 123456l for normal literals anyway. Also, the
precision snuggles next to the number - then you modify it. That seems
logical to me. Also,
On 31 May 2013 15:15, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
Greetings,
This patch implements N3642 - User-defined literals for
std::chrono::duration and std::basic_string
and N3660 - User-defined literals for std::complex.
Great, thanks!
User-defined literals were separated into two papers because of