On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Index: c-family/c-common.c
===
--- c-family/c-common.c (revision 205668)
+++ c-family/c-common.c (working copy)
@@ -4921,14 +4921,17 @@
On Thu, 2013-12-05 17:16:53 +0800, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
Index: c-family/c-common.c
===
--- c-family/c-common.c (revision 205668)
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
@@ -4994,6 +4997,22 @@ c_sizeof_or_alignof_type (location_t loc,
value = size_binop_loc (loc, CEIL_DIV_EXPR, TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type),
size_int (TYPE_PRECISION (char_type_node)
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:22:22PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
@@ -4994,6 +4997,22 @@ c_sizeof_or_alignof_type (location_t loc,
value = size_binop_loc (loc, CEIL_DIV_EXPR, TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (type),
size_int
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 12:43:03PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
The following should fix it.
2013-12-05 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
c-family/
* c-common.c (c_sizeof_or_alignof_type): Move a declaration into
[ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN].
Ok, thanks.
Jakub
As noted in PR 52023, C11 _Alignof should return the *least* alignment
required for a type in any context - meaning that on 32-bit x86,
_Alignof (double) and _Alignof (long long) should be 4 not 8 because
of the reduced alignment inside structures. (C++11 defines alignment
requirements
