On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>> It seems I need to reset the debug uses of a statement before moving
>> the statement itself. The attached patch starts from the leaf to root
>> of the tree to be reassociated and pla
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> It seems I need to reset the debug uses of a statement before moving
> the statement itself. The attached patch starts from the leaf to root
> of the tree to be reassociated and places them at the point where
> their dependences will be met a
I want to resend this patch for consideration. I applied the patch to
trunk and confirmed that it bootstraps and doesn't cause test
regressions. Is this ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Easwaran
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> It seems I need to reset the debug uses of a statement
On Dec 6, 2012, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>> I am unable to figure out the right way to handle the debug
>> statements. What I tried was to find debug statements that use the SSA
>> name defined by the statement I moved (using SSA_NAME_IMM_USE
It seems I need to reset the debug uses of a statement before moving
the statement itself. The attached patch starts from the leaf to root
of the tree to be reassociated and places them at the point where
their dependences will be met after reassociation. This bootstraps and
I am running the tests.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:54 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> I am unable to figure out the right way to handle the debug
> statements. What I tried was to find debug statements that use the SSA
> name defined by the statement I moved (using SSA_NAME_IMM_USE_NODE)
> and then moved them as well at the ri
I am unable to figure out the right way to handle the debug
statements. What I tried was to find debug statements that use the SSA
name defined by the statement I moved (using SSA_NAME_IMM_USE_NODE)
and then moved them as well at the right place. Thus, if I have to
move t1 = a + b down (after the d
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
Ping.
- Easwaran
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Ea
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Richard Biener
wro
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Easwaran Raman wrot
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
Hi,
During expression reassociation, statement
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 8:31 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> During expression reassociation, statements are conservatively moved
>>> downwards to ensure that dependen
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> During expression reassociation, statements are conservatively moved
>> downwards to ensure that dependences are correctly satisfied after
>> reassocation. This could lea
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During expression reassociation, statements are conservatively moved
> downwards to ensure that dependences are correctly satisfied after
> reassocation. This could lead to lengthening of live ranges. This
> patch moves statements o
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> During expression reassociation, statements are conservatively moved
>> downwards to ensure that dependences are correctly satisfied after
>> reassocation. This could le
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During expression reassociation, statements are conservatively moved
> downwards to ensure that dependences are correctly satisfied after
> reassocation. This could lead to lengthening of live ranges. This
> patch moves statements on
Hi,
During expression reassociation, statements are conservatively moved
downwards to ensure that dependences are correctly satisfied after
reassocation. This could lead to lengthening of live ranges. This
patch moves statements only to the extent necessary. Bootstraps and no
test regression on x8
18 matches
Mail list logo
