On 05/12/2015 03:42 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
just the major number. Then I only need the following small
patch (where I don't speak enough tcl for fixing
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
So we have
experimental
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
On May 12, 2015 6:11:45 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
So we have
experimental
release
post-release
Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
just the major number. Then I only need the following small
patch (where I don't speak enough tcl for fixing libjava.exp properly).
Without the FULL-VER trick the
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
just the major number. Then I only need the
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and adjust gcc/BASE-VER to
just the major number. Then I only need the following small
patch (where I don't speak
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
gcc/FULL-VER as copy of gcc/BASE-VER and
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 6:42 AM, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
I promised to send out my pat^Whack. Before building I introduce
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
So we have
experimental
release
post-release
Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is a one-line
change.
Why print anything at all? 5.1.1 is after 5.1.0 in obvious ways.
How can you tell GCC 5.1.1 on May 1, 2015
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
So we have
experimental
release
post-release
Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is a one-line
change.
Why print anything at all? 5.1.1 is after 5.1.0
14 matches
Mail list logo
