Re: Negative arguments in OpenMP 'num_threads' clause etc.

Hi Jakub! On Wed, 29 May 2019 16:52:45 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:42:14PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 17:51:46 +0200, I wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:47:08 -0800, Cesar Philippidis > > > wrote: > > > > One notable difference between

Re: Negative arguments in OpenMP 'num_threads' clause etc.

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 04:42:14PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Any comments on my question, please? > > On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 17:51:46 +0200, I wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:47:08 -0800, Cesar Philippidis > > wrote: > > > One notable difference between the trunk and gomp4 implementation

Re: Negative arguments in OpenMP 'num_threads' clause etc.

Hi Jakub! Any comments on my question, please? On Tue, 09 Apr 2019 17:51:46 +0200, I wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:47:08 -0800, Cesar Philippidis > wrote: > > One notable difference between the trunk and gomp4 implementation of the > > tile clause is that gomp4 errors on negative value tile

Negative arguments in OpenMP 'num_threads' clause etc. (was: [Patch 4/5] OpenACC tile clause support, Fortran front-end parts)

Hi Jakub! On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:47:08 -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > One notable difference between the trunk and gomp4 implementation of the > tile clause is that gomp4 errors on negative value tile arguments, > whereas trunk issues warnings. I'm picking up these changes, which have been