On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:28:12AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Am I on the right track with my assumption that it is correct that
nvptx.c:nvptx_option_override is not invoked in the offloading code path,
so we'd need a new target hook (?) to consolidate/override the options in
this scenario?
Hi!
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:50:20 +0100, I wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:44:26 +0100, I wrote:
If -freorder-blocks-and-partition is active, this results in PTX code
such as: [...]
Such partitioning might not make a lot of sense for the virtual ISA that
PTX is, but disabling it in
