Hi Jakub & Andrew,
on 2023/12/12 22:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:33:38AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> I leave this for the release managers, but I am not opposed to it for this
>> release... It would be nice to remove it for the next release
>
> I can live with it for
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:33:38AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> I leave this for the release managers, but I am not opposed to it for this
> release... It would be nice to remove it for the next release
I can live with it for GCC 14, so ok, but it is very ugly.
We should fix it in a better way
I leave this for the release managers, but I am not opposed to it for
this release... It would be nice to remove it for the next release
Andrew
On 12/12/23 01:07, Kewen.Lin wrote:
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639140.html
BR,
Kewen
on
Hi,
Gentle ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639140.html
BR,
Kewen
on 2023/12/4 17:49, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As PR112788 shows, on rs6000 with -mabi=ieeelongdouble type _Float128
> has the different type precision (128) from that (127) of type long
>
