C++ patch ping^3

Hi! I'd like to ping a couple of C++ patches. - c++, v2: Implement C++26 P2169R4 - Placeholder variables with no name [PR110349] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/630802.html - c++, v2: Implement C++26 P2741R3 - user-generated static_assert messages [PR110348] https:

Re: Patch ping^3 ([PATCH] libstdc++: Outline the overlapping case of string _M_replace into a separate function [PR105329])

On Mon, 12 Sept 2022 at 10:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:38:58AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 01:27:51PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:33:29AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patch

Patch ping^3 ([PATCH] libstdc++: Outline the overlapping case of string _M_replace into a separate function [PR105329])

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 11:38:58AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 01:27:51PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 11:33:29AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches > > wrote: > > > The following patch is partially a workaround

Re: Aarch64 patch ping^3

Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches writes: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 03:53:26PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:16:55AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> > > Looks good to me. Richard E knows this code better than I do though, >> > > so I think he should have the

Aarch64 patch ping^3

On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 03:53:26PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:16:55AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > Looks good to me. Richard E knows this code better than I do though, > > > so I think he should have the final say. He's currently on holiday > > >

Re: [PATCH PING^3] Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook

On 3/3/21 1:42 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:26 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 13:02 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >>> >>> On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote: Hello, I would like to ping the follow

Re: [PATCH PING^3] Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook

On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 21:26 +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 13:02 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > > > > > On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to ping the following patch: > > > > > > Add input_modes p

Re: [PATCH PING^3] Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook

On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 13:02 -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to ping the following patch: > > > > Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-Janu

Re: [PATCH PING^3] Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook

On 3/2/21 4:50 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to ping the following patch: > > Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/562898.html > > It is needed for the following regression fix: > >

[PATCH PING^3] Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook

Hello, I would like to ping the following patch: Add input_modes parameter to TARGET_MD_ASM_ADJUST hook https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/562898.html It is needed for the following regression fix: IBM Z: Fix usage of "f" constraint with long doubles https://gcc.gnu.org/pipe

Re: [PATCH ping 3] ppc64 check for incompatible setting of minimal-toc

Greetings yet again, It would be greatly appreciated if you could look at this patch when you have a minute. --Doug On 6/17/20 2:14 PM, Douglas B Rupp wrote: Greetings again, Could you please look at this patch when convenient? --Doug On 6/1/20 10:13 AM, Douglas B Rupp wrote: Greetings,

Re: [C++ PATCH, PING^3] PR60531 - Wrong error about unresolved overloaded function

Applied, thanks for your persistence. On 5/31/19 3:06 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote: another ping On 12/05/2019 17:57, Harald van Dijk wrote: ping again On 26/04/2019 19:58, Harald van Dijk wrote: ping On 13/04/2019 10:01, Harald van Dijk wrote: Hi, For PR60531, GCC wrongly rejects function t

[C++ PATCH, PING^3] PR60531 - Wrong error about unresolved overloaded function

another ping On 12/05/2019 17:57, Harald van Dijk wrote: ping again On 26/04/2019 19:58, Harald van Dijk wrote: ping On 13/04/2019 10:01, Harald van Dijk wrote: Hi, For PR60531, GCC wrongly rejects function templates with explicitly specified template arguments as overloaded. They are resol

Re: Patch ping^3

On 04/12/2018 02:41 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I'd like to ping the >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html >> - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes >> >> patch. Thanks. > > OK for stage1 and backp

Re: Patch ping^3

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:41:22AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > I'd like to ping the > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html > > - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes > > > > patch. Thanks. > > OK for sta

Patch ping^3

Hi! I'd like to ping the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes patch. Thanks. Jakub

Re: Patch ping^3

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to ping the > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01244.html > - PR83157 - improve debug info for x86 setcc peepholes > > patch. Thanks. OK for stage1 and backporting after it soaked there for a while. I'm too unfamilia

Patch ping^3

Hi! I'd like to ping the following wrong-code patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg01540.html libgcc __mulvDI3 fix - missed detection of overflow for

Re: [patch][Ping #3] PR80929: Realistic PARALLEL cost in seq_cost.

On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:17:44PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > So this has probably been hashed to death, but just a couple thoughts. > > I think realistically one has to look at the entirety of the PARALLEL to > get any reasonable costing. > > Summing the individual components is wrong. Taking the

Re: [patch][Ping #3] PR80929: Realistic PARALLEL cost in seq_cost.

On 06/29/2017 02:51 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > On 28.06.2017 22:18, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: >> Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> >> @@ -5300,6 +5300,9 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee >> set = single_set (seq); >> if (set) >> cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed); >> +

Re: [patch][Ping #3] PR80929: Realistic PARALLEL cost in seq_cost.

On 28.06.2017 22:18, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: Georg-Johann Lay wrote: @@ -5300,6 +5300,9 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee set = single_set (seq); if (set) cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed); + else if (INSN_P (seq) + && PARALLEL == GET_CODE (PAT

Re: [patch][Ping #3] PR80929: Realistic PARALLEL cost in seq_cost.

Georg-Johann Lay wrote: @@ -5300,6 +5300,9 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee set = single_set (seq); if (set) cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed); + else if (INSN_P (seq) + && PARALLEL == GET_CODE (PATTERN (seq))) + cost += insn_rtx_cost (PATT

[patch][Ping #3] PR80929: Realistic PARALLEL cost in seq_cost.

Ping #3 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg00096.html On 02.06.2017 09:53, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Hi, > > this small addition improves costs of PARALLELs in > rtlanal.c:seq_cost(). Up to now, these costs are > assumed to be 1 which gives gross inexact costs for, > e.g. divmod whi

[PATCH, PING*3] DWARF: space-optimize loc. descr. for integer literals on 32-bit targets

Hello, Ping for the patch submitted at . Thanks! -- Pierre-Marie de Rodat

RE: [RFA] Compact EH Patch [Ping^3]

> -Original Message- > From: Moore, Catherine > Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 8:53 AM > To: Richard Henderson; ja...@redhat.com > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: FW: [RFA] Compact EH Patch [Ping * 2] > > Ping, Ping. > > -Original Message- > From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.g

Re: [PATCH, PING*3] DWARF: materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations

On 11/23/2015 10:00 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: DWARF changes are OK. The other changes are in the Ada front-end. Eric approved them offline already, so I’ve pushed them. By the way, a lot of changes were already merged by Arnaud Charlet a couple of days ago. Thank you both for the review! --

Re: [PATCH, PING*3] DWARF: materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations

On 08/31/2015 03:26 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: On 07/25/2015 09:44 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: This change makes GCC materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations (DW_TAG_imported_declarations). For instance, procedure Foo renames Bar; will output: DW_T

[PATCH, PING*3] DWARF: materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations

On 07/25/2015 09:44 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: This change makes GCC materialize subprogram renamings in Ada as imported declarations (DW_TAG_imported_declarations). For instance, procedure Foo renames Bar; will output: DW_TAG_imported_declaration: DW_AT_name: foo

[PATCH, PING*3] PR rtl-optimization/66790: uninitialized registers handling in REE

On 07/19/2015 12:14 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: This patch is an attempt to fix PR rtl-optimization/66790: please see for the context. This adds a new dataflow problem (MIR for Must-Initialized Registers) and use it in the REE pass to remo

[PATCH, PING*3] Track indirect calls for call site information in debug info.

On 07/20/2015 02:45 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: On PowerPC targets with -mlongcall, most subprogram calls are turned into indirect calls: the call target is read from a register even though it is compile-time known. This makes it difficult for machine code static analysis engines to recover

[PATCH, PING*3] PR debug/53927: fix value for DW_AT_static_link

On 07/20/2015 09:39 AM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote: This patch fixes the static link description in DWARF to comply with the specification. In order to do so, it appends a field to all FRAME objects to hold the frame base address (DW_AT_frame_base) so that the nested subrograms can directly refe

Re: [PATCH][PING^3][AArch64] Specify CRC and Crypto support for Cortex-A53, A57

On 29/01/14 17:42, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 23/01/14 08:58, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: On 16/01/14 18:10, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: Hi all, The Cortex-A53 and Cortex-A57 cores support the CRC32 and Crypto extensions to the ARMv8-A architecture. This patch adds that information to their definitions in a

Patch ping^3

Hi! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01100.html - C++ -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess support (C is already in) http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00711.html - PR debug/54519 - first part of partial inlining debug info fixes Jakub

Re: [PATCH][PING^3] Vectorize conversions directly

Ping. The ARM portion of this patch is still awaiting approval. On 11/08/2011 12:35 PM, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote: Ping. On 10/28/2011 12:22 PM, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote: Here is the patch updated according to recent comments. 2011-10-28 Dmitry Plotnikov gcc/ * tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_assign_

Re: Patch ping #3

On 06/27/2011 07:47 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote: Extend TYPE_DECL_IS_STUB trick (1 line): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00683.html OK. Emit DW_AT_artificial for types: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00700.html OK. Fix PR lto/48492 (bis) (1 line): http://g

Patch ping #3

Extend TYPE_DECL_IS_STUB trick (1 line): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00683.html Emit DW_AT_artificial for types: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00700.html Fix PR lto/48492 (bis) (1 line): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01461.html Thanks in advan