On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:51 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Paul Hua wrote:
>> It's looks fixed
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965#c12 on mips64el.
> Hmm, is it fixed? or is it exposed now on mips64el? I read the latter
> from the comment.
It is fixe
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 10:25 AM, Paul Hua wrote:
> It's looks fixed
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965#c12 on mips64el.
Hmm, is it fixed? or is it exposed now on mips64el? I read the latter
from the comment.
I think the issue is like explained, but haven't dug into when/why it
It's looks fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965#c12 on mips64el.
Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Ping^2
>
> Thanks,
> bin
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Honza, do you think you could have a look at this P1
Ping^2
Thanks,
bin
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Honza, do you think you could have a look at this P1 fix?
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:03:51AM +, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This patch fixes invalid profile count information in vectorization pe
Hi!
Honza, do you think you could have a look at this P1 fix?
Thanks.
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:03:51AM +, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch fixes invalid profile count information in vectorization peeling.
> Current implementation is a bit confusing for me since it tries to compute
> an