On 11/28/13 00:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:11:59PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/13 00:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Use libbacktrace for libsanitizer's symbolization (will need tweaking,
depending on next libsanitizer merge, whether the corresponding
sanitizer_common
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:06:06PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
+ HOST_WIDE_INT offset, sz;
+ sz = ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE;
+ sz = data.asan_vec[0] - prev_offset;
Seems to me like the first assignment to sz is dead. Clearly
something isn't right here.
Thanks for catching that out,
Hi Jeff,
On my side, there's
[c++, driver] Add -lrt on Solaris
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg01488.html
resubmitted as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00412.html
It's unclear if the more intrusive solution outlined in the second
message (introduce
Here is the patch series that had been posted in Sep that is aimed to
isolate the Android support from targets that actually don't have that
support (We discussed the need of it with Jakub here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00185.html):
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:36:18AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
In fact, I would suggest that anyone with a pending patch from prior
to stage1 close that hasn't gotten feedback by midnight Tuesday ping
their patch. I'd like to have a sense of everything that
In fact, I would suggest that anyone with a pending patch from prior to
stage1 close that hasn't gotten feedback by midnight Tuesday ping their
patch. I'd like to have a sense of everything that is outstanding
sooner rather than later and wrap up any loose ends as quickly as possible.
On 11/27/13 05:30, Eric Botcazou wrote:
In fact, I would suggest that anyone with a pending patch from prior to
stage1 close that hasn't gotten feedback by midnight Tuesday ping their
patch. I'd like to have a sense of everything that is outstanding
sooner rather than later and wrap up any
On 11/27/13 04:48, Rainer Orth wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com writes:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:36:18AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
In fact, I would suggest that anyone with a pending patch from prior
to stage1 close that hasn't gotten feedback by midnight Tuesday ping
their patch. I'd
On 11/27/13 01:28, Alexander Ivchenko wrote:
Here is the patch series that had been posted in Sep that is aimed to
isolate the Android support from targets that actually don't have that
support (We discussed the need of it with Jakub here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00185.html):
On 11/27/13 00:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
AddressSanitizer use-after-return instrumentation:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg02070.html
+ HOST_WIDE_INT offset, sz;
+ sz = ASAN_RED_ZONE_SIZE;
+ sz = data.asan_vec[0] - prev_offset;
Seems to me like the first
On 11/27/13 00:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Use libbacktrace for libsanitizer's symbolization (will need tweaking,
depending on next libsanitizer merge, whether the corresponding
sanitizer_common changes are upstreamed or not, and perhaps to compile
libbacktrace sources again with renamed function
On 11/27/13 00:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Elemental function support (updated version of the earlier patch):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03197.html
Richi OK's this earlier today. So it's good to go, right? I thought I
saw some follow-up items that Richi agreed could be done
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:26:54PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/13 00:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Elemental function support (updated version of the earlier patch):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03197.html
Richi OK's this earlier today. So it's good to go, right? I
thought
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:11:59PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/27/13 00:36, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Use libbacktrace for libsanitizer's symbolization (will need tweaking,
depending on next libsanitizer merge, whether the corresponding
sanitizer_common changes are upstreamed or not, and perhaps
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 09:36:18AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
In fact, I would suggest that anyone with a pending patch from prior
to stage1 close that hasn't gotten feedback by midnight Tuesday ping
their patch. I'd like to have a sense of everything that is
outstanding sooner rather than later
15 matches
Mail list logo
