Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

On Fri, 9 Sept 2022 at 20:01, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > s/__weak/__is_weak/g perhaps? Yes, that'll do. Fixed by the attached, with a test to avoid it happening again. Tested x86_64-linux, pushed to trunk. > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 11:46 AM Iain Sandoe via Libstdc++ > wrote: >> >> >> >> >

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

s/__weak/__is_weak/g perhaps? On Fri, Sep 9, 2022 at 11:46 AM Iain Sandoe via Libstdc++ < libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > On 9 Sep 2022, at 19:36, Rainer Orth > wrote: > > > > >> Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches > >> that have been going around. I'm

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

> On 9 Sep 2022, at 19:36, Rainer Orth wrote: > >> Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches >> that have been going around. I'm testing this now. >> >> Please take a look. > > unfortunately, this patch broke macOS bootstrap (seen on >

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

Hi Jonathan, > Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches > that have been going around. I'm testing this now. > > Please take a look. unfortunately, this patch broke macOS bootstrap (seen on x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2): In file included from

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

Looks good to me. Tom. On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 4:56 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches > that have been going around. I'm testing this now. > > Please take a look. >

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

Here's a complete patch that combines the various incremental patches that have been going around. I'm testing this now. Please take a look. commit 4a0a8ec5bc2a890a1568f99eace666e9f72d Author: Thomas Rodgers Date: Thu Aug 25 11:11:40 2022 libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic

Re: Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

Sorry for the delay in getting to this. I am currently working on moving the bulk of the atomic wait implementation into the .so. I'd like to get that work to a stable state before revisiting this patch, but obviously if we want this to make it into GCC13, it needs to happen sooner rather than

Patch ping (was Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Clear padding bits in atomic compare_exchange)

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 09:48:19PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 01:26, Thomas Rodgers wrote: > > > This should address Jonathan's feedback and adds support for atomic_ref > > > > > >This change implements P0528 which requires that padding bits not >